Students, faculty and staff protest a potential tuition increase across the California State University system.
Credit: Michael Lee-Chang / Students for Quality Education
California State University trustees will decide this week on whether students will see a 6% tuition rate increase over the next five years.
But ahead of their Wednesday vote, the nation’s largest public university system has already tweaked the proposal: Any tuition rate increase will sunset after five years and be reevaluated for the 2029-30 academic year.
The proposal would go into effect in the fall 2024 semester and affect the system’s 460,000 undergraduate and graduate students. The first increase would be $342 for full-time undergraduate students.
Last year, CSU assembled a work group to examine sustainable funding in the 23-campus system and found the costs of operating the university system exceeded its revenues. The work group also found that Gov. Gavin Newsom’s multiyear financial compact, made with the CSU to increase enrollment and improve graduation rates in exchange for annual 5% funding increases, did not fully meet the system’s funding needs, said Steve Relyea, chief financial officer for the Cal State system, during a recent call with reporters.
“The absence of tuition increases in 11 of the past 12 years has prevented the CSU from having sufficient resources to help keep up with rising costs,” he said.
The new tuition proposal would generate $148 million of new ongoing revenue in its first year, said Ryan Storm, the system’s assistant vice chancellor for budget. Over five years, the system would see about $840 million in new funding.
The increase would also allow CSU to invest more dollars into financial aid. About 60% of undergraduate students would not be affected by the tuition increase because their tuition is covered by grants, scholarships and waivers. Eighty-one percent of undergraduate students receive some form of financial aid.
“The additional revenue would be invested in the budget priorities that reflect the values and the mission of the university,” Storm said, adding that those priorities include academic and student service support for basic needs and mental health services, improving Title IX practices, improving maintenance and building new facilities, and improving compensation to attract and retain faculty and other CSU employees.
Cal State is currently facing a $1.5 billion funding gap, in addition to demands from its faculty and employee unions to improve compensation and wages. Students who are vehemently against the rate increase will rally and protest the proposal during the board meeting Tuesday and Wednesday.
The California Faculty Association, which represents the system‘s professors, is against a tuition rate increase even though it has reached an impasse in contract negotiations to improve wages. Currently, CFA is demanding a 12% increase in compensation, while Cal State is offering 5%. The association is also advocating for a semester of paid parental leave and workload relief. It also wants to be involved whenever faculty have contact with campus police.
“We’re not buying the austerity message that the CSU is sending out,” said Charles Toombs, president of the faculty association. “We know that the CSU has plenty of money in reserves and in investments, so we know they can fund not only our salary increases in our proposals but also the salary proposals that the other unions are demanding. We just don’t buy that they need to put our salary increase on the backs of students.”
But Cal State only has about 33 days of funding — or about $766 million — in its reserves, and the board’s policy is that the system has about three to six months of funding, which it doesn’t, said Relyea, CSU’s chief financial officer.
He underscored that the system needs the new tuition revenue to increase salaries. About 70% to 80% of any university’s budget is driven by faculty and staff salary and benefits, Relyea said, adding that the tuition rate increase is “driven by wanting to and needing to compensate faculty and staff at a fair rate that represents the market.”
Student walk up and down the Promenade to Shields Library at UC Davis.
Credit: Gregory Urquiaga / UC Davis
Top Takeaways
UC is likely to continue raising tuition for each incoming class and then freezing the cost for that cohort of students for up to six years.
The rate of increase each year is based on inflation but has been capped at 5%. Regents appear opposed to increasing that cap.
UC is worried about federal cuts and uncertain state finances. Students are concerned about affordability.
The University of California’s Board of Regents on Thursday indicated support for continuing to raise tuition for each incoming freshman class for at least several more years, though many regents appeared skeptical of hiking the maximum increase allowed each year.
Since the 2022-23 academic year, tuition has gone up for each incoming class of undergraduates, ranging from 3.5% to 5%. But the price was also then frozen for the duration of their enrollment, so long as they graduate within six years. The rate of increase each year is based largely on inflation, but is capped at 5%.
California residents who entered this past fall pay $14,436 in tuition and systemwide fees, not including some additional campus fees, living expenses and books, and will continue to pay that rate each year. For in-state freshmen starting this fall, their rate will be $14,934, about 3.4% higher. Out-of-state and international students pay significantly higher rates.
When the regents approved the so-called tuition stability plan in July 2021, they agreed to reconsider it prior to the 2027-28 academic year. Most regents said they want to renew the cohort policy, describing it as a resounding success that has improved campus budgets and brought predictability to students and their families. In the past, tuition increases affected all students from all cohorts, whether freshmen or seniors, at the same time and the same rates, often raising costs in the middle of their education.
The regents did not take action Thursday to formally extend the plan and only discussed the policy. A vote on it may be scheduled as soon as November, officials said.
A number of regents, however, appeared unlikely to support proposals from UC administrators to allow for even greater tuition increases, including one to increase the maximum tuition hike in a given year from 5% to 7%.
“I think it’s remarkable the success we’ve had, and that’s why I want to continue it,” said Richard Leib, a regent and a past chair of the board. “But I also have the feeling that if it’s not broken, why are we trying to fix it?”
UC staff said upping the maximum increases could help the system navigate budget problems, including federal cuts to research funding and state funding uncertainties.
The president of the UC Student Association, meanwhile, encouraged the regents to get rid of the policy altogether and keep tuition flat after the 2026-27 academic year.
“In order to ensure that the university can be a space that is accessible to students financially, I strongly urge you all to not renew the cohort tuition model,” Aditi Hariharan, a fourth-year student at UC Davis, said during remarks to the board. She added that keeping the policy would threaten UC’s ability to enroll “a diverse range of students from all economic backgrounds.”
In defending the plan, UC officials said Thursday that the policy has actually made attending UC less expensive for the system’s low-income students.
Shawn Brick, the system’s associate vice provost for student financial support, noted that the state’s Cal Grant program fully covers tuition and fees for qualifying students. Additionally, UC sets aside 45% of revenue generated from the tuition policy for financial aid. That, Brick said, has provided the system’s neediest students with additional aid for other expenses, such as textbooks, that was not previously available.
Nathan Brostrom, the system’s chief financial officer, said the policy has also generated $375 million in new revenue for campus operations, which has been used to support faculty-to-student ratios and improve student services.
At the same time, officials said the policy has not been a cure-all and that higher tuition revenue and state budget support have not kept pace with rising costs.
The UC staff on Thursday suggested three potential scenarios that would generate even more revenue from the tuition policy. One would be the proposal to increase the maximum annual increase to 7%. Another would be to add another increase, possibly 1%, on top of the inflation-based increase. The third option would be to reduce the amount of revenue that is set aside for financial aid, from 45% to 35%.
Most regents who spoke said they disapproved of the proposal to allow for annual increases as high as 7%. Maria Anguiano, the board’s vice chair, said she remains supportive of renewing the original policy, but added that tuition hikes of 7% “no longer feels modest.”
State Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, an ex-officio voting member of the board, said increasing the cap to 7% would be a “very significant change” and suggested tabling the idea altogether.
“If we have an extraordinary circumstance where you all feel the need to increase tuition more than 5% in any given year, you should have to come back to this body and explain why,” she said.
Jay Sures was one of the only regents who appeared to support the proposal. He said federal changes and threats have created “true headwinds for this university system” and that there are “issues with what potential state funding could be going forward that could potentially pose a true existential threat” to the system.
“What would happen if we did have a cap and our shortfall was such that we were in that sort of disaster situation? What are we going to be able to do if we put a cap on it today and we fall into that situation tomorrow?” Sures said.
Before the UC staff brings an official proposal to the board, they plan to consult with incoming President James Milliken, who takes over on Aug. 1, said Brostrom, the chief financial officer.
Janet Reilly, the board chair, said the current plan is to bring an action item to the board’s meeting in November, but added that could change.
“I think that what you are hearing from this group is a lot of gratitude and much satisfaction with the program that we rolled out,” Reilly said. “But still there are questions to be answered.”
Students, faculty and staff protest a potential tuition increase across the California State University system on Sept 12, 2023.
CREDIT: MICHAEL LEE-CHANG / STUDENTS FOR QUALITY EDUCATION
California State University students will see a 6% annual tuition increase starting fall 2024.
The system’s board of trustees voted 15-5 for the five-year tuition rate hike Wednesday despite vocal opposition from students, faculty and staff during more than 2 1/2 hours of public comment. The rate increase will affect the system’s 460,000 undergraduate and graduate students. The board also agreed to sunset the increase after five years and be reevaluated for the 2029-30 academic year.
The vote means that the first annual increase would be $342 to $6,084 for full-time undergraduate students in 2024. Full-time graduate students will see tuition increase by $432 to $7,608.
CSU outlined its need for the new revenue from the tuition hike. CSU is facing a $1.5 billion deficit. The increase will generate $148 million in new, ongoing revenue in its first year and about $840 million over the five years.
“This is really a difficult decision for all of us,” trustee Leslie Gilbert-Lurie said. “I reluctantly support raising tuition because, for the moment, I don’t feel we have found an alternative path, and I think part of the reason that we heard the anger and the anxiety from the public is that it is shocking that we have created a culture where people don’t expect tuition to be raised.”
California State University Tuition Rate Approved Increases
Cal State tuition has only been raised once in the past 12 years, according to the chancellor’s office.
“Somewhere along the way, we gave people the impression that this system is magically going to create money to sustain itself, and what we see instead, as I have toured campuses, is shocking disrepair of buildings and salaries we can’t pay,” Gilbert-Lurie said.
The CSU is facing demands to improve its Title IX policies and close equity gaps in student academics and graduation rates. It also has about $30 billion in capital maintenance and construction needs, enrollment challenges and demands to improve employee compensation and wages, trustee Jack McGrory said. “We start with a $1.5 billion dollar structural deficit that accumulated over the years because we didn’t take tough actions along the way,” he said.
The board also approved a new tuition policy that requires that any future tuition hike be assessed 18 months before it goes into effect and increases institutional financial aid by at least a third of any expected additional revenue received from tuition increases or enrollment growth. The trustees will also review the tuition policy every five years because rate increases will not be longer than five years.
“The system is facing revenue shortfalls,” interim Chancellor Jolene Koester said. “We have also proposed a salary step structure for our staff, and the bottom line is that the total new proposed financial commitments that have been offered to our faculty and staff for the current year, 2023-24, far exceeds the entire amount of new funding available to the CSU in the 2023-24 state budget.”
Koester said the university presidents must make “extremely difficult, extremely painful decisions regarding how they’re going to reallocate their already limited financial resources” to meet those compensation obligations.
Student-trustee Diana Aguilar-Cruz offered trustees an alternative solution to shorten the tuition rate hike from five years to three or four, but the other trustees rejected that idea.
“This will benefit students in the long term and in the years to come,” she said. “But right now, it will harm our students.”
With students applying to CSU campuses for admission starting Oct. 1, Steve Relyea, the system’s chief financial officer, said the trustees could not delay voting on a tuition rate increase.
California may have low public college tuition costs when compared to other colleges and universities nationally, but it is not enough to prevent students from taking high amounts of student loans.
A new study released exclusively to EdSource from The Century Foundation found Californians have higher average student debt balances, risky graduate school debt, a unique reliance on parent-held debt and significantly high student debt among Black families.
California’s high cost of living makes debt inevitable for many students, but the risk is greater for students from lower-income families and communities of color eager to use education as a ladder into the middle class. Open-ended loans aimed at parents and graduate students are particularly burdensome, including those used to attend for-profit colleges.
Despite having a smaller share of student loan borrowers when compared with other states, California’s borrowers are in the top third among states, with an average of $37,400 owed, according to national data from June 2022. That figure includes all borrowers, regardless of whether they attended college in California. The state ranks 16th out of 50 states and the District of Columbia for borrowers with high balances. This is despite having the fourth-lowest rate of student borrowers.
“One of California’s great successes is in college affordability and the fact that so many students go through college without debt,” said Peter Granville, a fellow at the foundation studying federal and state policy efforts to improve college affordability and author of the study. “Unfortunately, the Californians who do borrow take out some of the most risky debt around.” The foundation is a progressive, independent think tank that researches and promotes policy change to foster equity.
Besides the impact on individuals, student loan debt has become a larger problem for the American economy. Nationally, the current student loan debt totals $1.77 trillion.
“Student debt is something that is different from what it was 10 or 20 years ago,” U.S. Undersecretary of Education James Kvaal told higher education reporters earlier this month at UC Riverside. “People are borrowing more. They’re struggling more with those loans. It’s not just a problem for the 43 million Americans with student loan debt when they cannot afford to buy a house, start a new business or save for their own children or their retirement. It’s a problem for their families. It’s a problem for their communities. It’s a problem for our economy. It’s a fundamental crisis that we have to address in our country. We have to change how we’re financing higher education.”
Loan repayments restarting in October
With the Supreme Court rejecting President Joe Biden’s attempt to forgive $20,000 in loans for millions of borrowers, many are preparing to restart repayments in October. The situation underscores a larger student loan crisis in California and across the country. Millions of people, including those who never graduated from college and parents, are carrying student loan debt that they cannot afford and realistically may not ever pay back.
“Californians really struggle with repayment,” Granville said. “The state economy demands a college education, and I believe that demand drives up borrowing.”
And the situation is worse for graduates and families that borrow from the federal Parent PLUS and Grad PLUS loan programs that allow parents to borrow on behalf of their college students and graduate students to afford higher degrees, Granville said, adding that both programs offer high-interest, uncapped loans.
“These loans are probably the worst things to dangle in front of families with real genuine fears of being left behind economically,” he said. “But that leads to high balances that are difficult to manage.”
Graduate loan debt is larger in California than in the rest of the country, the study found. The state’s average annual Grad Plus loan is 25% higher than the rest of the country. In-state graduate students borrow on average $28,300 in loans each year compared with $22,400 nationally.
California places a premium on higher education in the state, Granville said. The average California worker with a graduate degree earns $108,500 – a 50% increase above the average income for bachelor’s degree holders.
The state also sees a disproportionate share of Black students borrowing student loans. In the 2015-16 academic year, 28% of Black in-state undergraduates borrowed loans compared with 21% of all undergraduates. At the graduate level, 81% of Black Californians took out student loans compared to 51% of all other graduate students.
“High borrowing among Black students in California locks in inequality that can last long into repayment,” Granville said. “Despite having a college degree and living in a higher income state, Black borrowers in California actually show worse financial security.”
Black women undergraduates borrow at the highest rates in any one year, with 31% taking loans in 2015-16 compared with 21% of all undergraduates, according to the study.
Granville said the data reflects the racial wealth gap.
“Black families have fewer financial resources than white families,” he said. “That leads to it being a lot harder to ask a Black family to self-finance education without debt. Homeownership also matters. You can take out a home equity loan for a much lower rate than a Parent Plus loan, for example.”
Latinos follow Black borrowers but with not as high graduate loan debt at 62%. But Latino families also have concerning trends. The majority of Latino borrowers in California don’t have a college degree, while only one-quarter of white borrowers don’t. The report explains that this could be due to a greater share of Latinos leaving college before they earn a degree or higher shares of parents borrowing on behalf of their children.
Granville said the state should examine whether all California families are “being potentially set up to fail.”
“Lawmakers should be looking at the colleges within California and asking, are colleges passing on high costs to students knowing that they can take out this uncapped loan debt?” he said. “I worry about how some loans are being sold to students by their colleges. Unless families are getting wise counsel, they may be unknowingly signing up for a pretty tough repayment experience.”
The racial wealth gap, along with California’s cost of living, makes it particularly challenging for Californians to pay their student debt, Granville said.
Repaying more than $200,000
In many ways, Richelle Brooks is a college success story. She’s also an outlier in the student debt crisis.
Credit: Courtesy of Richelle Brooks
Richelle Brooks
A first-generation college student, Brooks earned an associate degree from El Camino College, then went on to earn a bachelor’s and master’s degree from Cal State Dominguez Hills. She graduated with her doctorate in 2018 from Cal State Los Angeles.
Now, as a Los Angeles-area high school principal, she mentors and educates low-income students and students of color. She’s also facing more than $237,000 of student loan debt. The mom of three can’t fathom repaying it all, even with her $120,000 annual salary.
Enrolling in community colleges even after graduating with her doctorate, as well as the three-year pandemic pause, allowed her to put off making payments. But that could be coming to an end.
Brooks, who advocates for student loan forgiveness, participates in one of the federal government’s income-driven repayment plans, which slowly escalates her monthly payments based on her income as a high school principal. Her first payment, which restarts in October, is for $700. But by June 2024 it will increase to $2,600 a month.
“I ran the numbers,” Brooks, 36, said. “It’ll be cheaper to stay in school the rest of my life than to pay that $200,000.” (Federal loan repayments pause while a person is enrolled in school.)
About $33,000 of Brooks’ debt is just from interest that accumulated over the years. But because of the interest, Brooks said that her ability to pay off the debt “doesn’t exist.”
“On paper, it sounds like I make a lot of money,” she said. “But they’re not taking into consideration that I live in LA and I have three kids.”
Brook’s partner is a military veteran and teacher. He doesn’t have student loans because of his military service, but the couple found they’re unable to purchase a home for their family because of Brook’s debt-to-income ratio, a situation that affects many student borrowers. Brooks also supports her mother, who lives with the family after facing homelessness.
California’s high cost of living makes it difficult for young people coming out of college without significant family resources to accumulate assets like a home, especially if they have student loan debt. In California, 78% of Black households with student debt and 74% of Latino households with student debt have less than $50,000 in savings and investments, compared with 57% of white households with student loans, according to The Century Foundation.
In addition to her work as a principal, Brooks said she’s taken on other jobs to make ends meet, including driving Uber, and that’s before the loan repayments begin.
“Whatever it takes to make sure my kids have what they need and the bills are paid,” she said.
Brooks’ two oldest children are in high school and affording college is a common discussion in their home.
“I do not foresee a way for me to pay off my debt and figure out a way to pay my kids’ college, and I do not want them to go into debt,” she said. “I talked to my daughter about joining the military, but it’s kind of terrifying too because she’s a little Black girl. … So I’m trying to figure it out.”
As an educator, Brooks could apply for Public Service Loan Forgiveness, which she is considering once again. The program typically forgives the debt of people who work for a government or nonprofit employer, such as teachers, first responders and nurses. But forgiveness isn’t granted until after the borrower makes 120 or 10 years of payments.
Restarting repayments
Although Brooks’ debt amounts are larger than the average of most borrowers, her struggle to repay her college loans is common.
“In the popular imagination, there is this idea that student debt is a young people issue,” said Thomas Gokey, an organizer and co-founder of The Debt Collective, a union of advocates for publicly funded college, universal health care and guaranteed housing. “The truth is that the debt just doesn’t go away.”
People age, have children, grandchildren, and careers decades removed from graduation, and the “debt is still there,” Gokey said, adding that for many people, the monthly payments don’t cover the interest.
Some people have fully paid back their principle multiple times over, with the outstanding balance higher than the original balance. Other people may fall on hard times and can’t make payments, which leads to massive penalties, he said, referring to one case where a borrower defaulted on her student loan during the 2008 financial crisis and saw a $10,000 penalty added to her balance.
For undergraduates, even when their financial aid forms say they have $0 in expected family contributions, the cost of college attendance and tuition has increased to the point where aid doesn’t cover everything, he said. “The only option is Parent Plus loans to fill the gap. It’s just astonishing that a lot of parents will be paying off the loans for a longer period of time than they lived with or raised the children that they got the loan for.”
Granville said many, trying to get ahead, take on more loans after undergraduate loans.
“Students often turn to graduate education when they’re struggling with their undergraduate loans,” he said. “They may see the next degree as the thing that will give them the earning power to handle the debt that they have struggled with already.”
There is a misperception that a graduate degree means a person will be “really successful” and “make a lot of money,” Gokey said. “And that’s just not true if you’re a social worker,” he added, as an example of a lower salary job.
According to The Century Foundation’s data, a social worker with a bachelor’s degree earns on average $34,183 one year after completing their program, but has an average $15,599 in student loans. A social worker with a master’s degree earns an average of $54,223 one year after completing their program, but has on average nearly $80,000 in student loans. Licensed clinical social workers in California are required by the state to have a master’s degree in social work.
Gokey said that there’s no way to “financial literacy yourself” out of student loan debt.
Options and fixes
Although interest rates restarted in September and repayments resume in October, the federal government is giving borrowers a one-year grace period as it attempts to fix the loan system and offer solutions that significantly lower monthly payments.
“We really inherited a student loan system that was broken,” Kvaal said. “Before the student loan pause, we had a million students a year defaulting on their student loans.”
Kvaal said those defaults weren’t from people running from their responsibilities, but borrowers struggling with payments. Many of them were first-generation or students of color, he said.
Institution name
Type
Stafford (undergraduate)
Parent PLUS
Grad PLUS
Academy of Art University
For-profit
37%
30%
42%
Advanced Career Institute
For-profit
31%
n/a
n/a
Allan Hancock College
Public
42%
n/a
n/a
Alliant International University-San Diego
For-profit
n/a
n/a
n/a
American Academy of Dramatic Arts-Los Angeles
Non-profit
37%
n/a
n/a
American Career College-Los Angeles
For-profit
34%
21%
n/a
American Career College-Ontario
For-profit
37%
32%
n/a
American College of Healthcare and Technology
For-profit
51%
n/a
n/a
American River College
Public
44%
n/a
n/a
Angeles Institute
For-profit
32%
n/a
n/a
Antelope Valley College
Public
43%
n/a
n/a
Antioch University-Los Angeles
Non-profit
36%
n/a
n/a
Art Center College of Design
Non-profit
29%
n/a
n/a
Asher College
For-profit
31%
n/a
n/a
Ashford University
For-profit
46%
37%
44%
Associated Technical College-Los Angeles
For-profit
49%
n/a
n/a
Associated Technical College-San Diego
For-profit
n/a
n/a
n/a
Avalon School of Cosmetology-Alameda
For-profit
41%
n/a
n/a
Aveda Institute-Los Angeles
For-profit
37%
n/a
n/a
Azusa Pacific University
Non-profit
25%
16%
42%
Bakersfield College
Public
43%
n/a
n/a
Bard College – MAT Program CA
Non-profit
24%
17%
n/a
Bellus Academy-Chula Vista
For-profit
36%
n/a
n/a
Bellus Academy-El Cajon
For-profit
31%
n/a
n/a
Bellus Academy-Poway
For-profit
29%
n/a
n/a
Berkeley City College
Public
37%
n/a
n/a
Bethel Seminary-San Diego
Non-profit
18%
22%
36%
Biola University
Non-profit
20%
22%
32%
Blake Austin College
For-profit
27%
n/a
n/a
Brandman University
Non-profit
31%
n/a
39%
Brownson Technical School
For-profit
17%
n/a
n/a
Butte College
Public
42%
n/a
n/a
Cabrillo College
Public
42%
n/a
n/a
California Aeronautical University
For-profit
36%
n/a
n/a
California Baptist University
Non-profit
31%
30%
43%
California Career Institute
For-profit
32%
n/a
n/a
California College of the Arts
Non-profit
26%
32%
47%
California College San Diego
Non-profit
44%
n/a
n/a
California Hair Design Academy
For-profit
26%
n/a
n/a
California Healing Arts College
For-profit
37%
n/a
n/a
California Institute of Integral Studies
Non-profit
n/a
n/a
n/a
California Institute of the Arts
Non-profit
37%
n/a
n/a
California Lutheran University
Non-profit
22%
26%
n/a
California Nurses Educational Institute
For-profit
32%
n/a
n/a
California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo
Public
12%
14%
24%
California State Polytechnic University-Pomona
Public
21%
22%
38%
California State University Maritime Academy
Public
17%
n/a
n/a
California State University-Bakersfield
Public
29%
n/a
n/a
California State University-Channel Islands
Public
22%
17%
n/a
California State University-Chico
Public
23%
22%
n/a
California State University-Dominguez Hills
Public
27%
n/a
32%
California State University-East Bay
Public
25%
22%
35%
California State University-Fresno
Public
24%
n/a
34%
California State University-Fullerton
Public
20%
27%
29%
California State University-Long Beach
Public
20%
22%
37%
California State University-Los Angeles
Public
23%
n/a
37%
California State University-Monterey Bay
Public
24%
17%
37%
California State University-Northridge
Public
22%
17%
37%
California State University-Sacramento
Public
24%
20%
36%
California State University-San Bernardino
Public
27%
22%
40%
California State University-San Marcos
Public
23%
n/a
n/a
California State University-Stanislaus
Public
23%
17%
36%
California Western School of Law
Non-profit
n/a
n/a
n/a
Cambridge Junior College-Yuba City
For-profit
31%
n/a
n/a
Career Academy of Beauty
For-profit
22%
n/a
n/a
Career Care Institute
For-profit
37%
n/a
n/a
Career Networks Institute
For-profit
33%
n/a
n/a
Carrington College-Sacramento
For-profit
37%
20%
n/a
Casa Loma College-Van Nuys
Non-profit
27%
n/a
n/a
CBD College
Non-profit
27%
n/a
n/a
Central Coast College
For-profit
22%
n/a
n/a
Cerritos College
Public
32%
n/a
n/a
CET-San Diego
Non-profit
40%
n/a
n/a
Chabot College
Public
37%
n/a
n/a
Chamberlain University-California
For-profit
26%
24%
30%
Chapman University
Non-profit
20%
18%
n/a
Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science
Non-profit
n/a
n/a
37%
Cinta Aveda Institute
For-profit
36%
n/a
n/a
Citrus College
Public
33%
n/a
n/a
City College of San Francisco
Public
43%
n/a
n/a
Claremont Graduate University
Non-profit
n/a
n/a
n/a
Coastline Community College
Public
43%
n/a
n/a
Cogswell University of Silicon Valley
For-profit
32%
n/a
n/a
College of Marin
Public
51%
n/a
n/a
College of the Canyons
Public
37%
n/a
n/a
College of the Redwoods
Public
37%
n/a
n/a
College of the Sequoias
Public
32%
n/a
n/a
College of the Siskiyous
Public
45%
n/a
n/a
Columbia College – Los Alamitos
Non-profit
39%
n/a
38%
Columbia College Hollywood
Non-profit
39%
32%
n/a
Concorde Career College-Garden Grove
For-profit
27%
n/a
n/a
Concorde Career College-North Hollywood
For-profit
29%
n/a
n/a
Concorde Career College-San Bernardino
For-profit
35%
n/a
n/a
Concorde Career College-San Diego
For-profit
37%
n/a
n/a
Concordia University-Irvine
Non-profit
22%
27%
27%
Contra Costa College
Public
37%
n/a
n/a
Cosumnes River College
Public
45%
n/a
n/a
Cuesta College
Public
30%
n/a
n/a
Culinary Institute of America at Greystone
Non-profit
24%
33%
n/a
Cypress College
Public
30%
n/a
n/a
De Anza College
Public
34%
n/a
n/a
Design’s School of Cosmetology
For-profit
36%
n/a
n/a
DeVry University-California
For-profit
42%
29%
40%
Diablo Valley College
Public
27%
n/a
n/a
Diversified Vocational College
For-profit
51%
n/a
n/a
Dominican University of California
Non-profit
20%
n/a
37%
East Los Angeles College
Public
33%
n/a
n/a
Empire College
For-profit
27%
n/a
n/a
Feather River Community College District
Public
41%
n/a
n/a
Federico Beauty Institute
For-profit
27%
n/a
n/a
FIDM-Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising-Los Angeles
For-profit
30%
32%
n/a
Fielding Graduate University
Non-profit
n/a
n/a
37%
Folsom Lake College
Public
42%
n/a
n/a
Foothill College
Public
35%
n/a
n/a
Fremont College
For-profit
43%
n/a
n/a
Fresno City College
Public
37%
n/a
n/a
Fresno Pacific University
Non-profit
28%
n/a
38%
Fuller Theological Seminary
Non-profit
n/a
n/a
n/a
Fullerton College
Public
36%
n/a
n/a
Glendale Career College
For-profit
22%
n/a
n/a
Glendale Community College
Public
27%
n/a
n/a
Golden Gate University-San Francisco
Non-profit
27%
n/a
n/a
Golden West College
Public
32%
n/a
n/a
Grossmont College
Public
30%
n/a
n/a
Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts
For-profit
25%
n/a
n/a
Harvey Mudd College
Non-profit
8%
n/a
n/a
High Desert Medical College
For-profit
31%
n/a
n/a
Holy Names University
Non-profit
31%
n/a
n/a
Homestead Schools
Non-profit
32%
n/a
n/a
Hope International University
Non-profit
30%
n/a
n/a
Humboldt State University
Public
29%
22%
37%
Humphreys University-Stockton and Modesto Campuses
Non-profit
41%
n/a
n/a
Hussian College-Los Angeles
For-profit
53%
n/a
n/a
Institute for Business and Technology
For-profit
36%
n/a
n/a
Institute of Culinary Education
For-profit
19%
n/a
n/a
Institute of Technology
For-profit
43%
n/a
n/a
InterCoast Colleges-Santa Ana
For-profit
40%
n/a
n/a
International School of Beauty Inc
For-profit
42%
n/a
n/a
International School of Cosmetology
For-profit
32%
n/a
n/a
Irvine Valley College
Public
37%
n/a
n/a
John F. Kennedy University
Non-profit
37%
n/a
n/a
La Sierra University
Non-profit
33%
27%
n/a
Laguna College of Art and Design
Non-profit
27%
n/a
n/a
Laney College
Public
47%
n/a
n/a
Laurus College
For-profit
53%
n/a
n/a
Life Chiropractic College West
Non-profit
n/a
n/a
47%
Life Pacific University
Non-profit
22%
n/a
n/a
Loma Linda University
Non-profit
22%
n/a
n/a
Long Beach City College
Public
36%
n/a
n/a
Los Angeles Center
Non-profit
29%
n/a
n/a
Los Angeles City College
Public
37%
n/a
n/a
Los Angeles Film School
For-profit
47%
37%
n/a
Los Angeles Mission College
Public
37%
n/a
n/a
Los Angeles Pierce College
Public
40%
n/a
n/a
Los Angeles Southwest College
Public
32%
n/a
n/a
Los Angeles Trade Technical College
Public
39%
n/a
n/a
Los Angeles Valley College
Public
37%
n/a
n/a
Loyola Marymount University
Non-profit
17%
24%
n/a
Lu Ross Academy
For-profit
26%
n/a
n/a
Make-up Designory
For-profit
19%
22%
n/a
Marshall B Ketchum University
Non-profit
n/a
n/a
32%
Marymount California University
Non-profit
35%
n/a
n/a
Mayfield College
For-profit
39%
n/a
n/a
Mendocino College
Public
42%
n/a
n/a
Menlo College
Non-profit
27%
n/a
n/a
Merritt College
Public
42%
n/a
n/a
Miami Ad School-San Francisco
For-profit
32%
n/a
n/a
Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey
Non-profit
14%
n/a
n/a
Milan Institute of Cosmetology-Fairfield
For-profit
49%
n/a
n/a
Milan Institute-Fresno
For-profit
46%
n/a
n/a
Milan Institute-Palm Desert
For-profit
45%
n/a
n/a
Milan Institute-Visalia
For-profit
34%
n/a
n/a
Mills College
Non-profit
26%
n/a
n/a
MiraCosta College
Public
37%
n/a
n/a
Moler Barber College
For-profit
n/a
n/a
n/a
Monterey Peninsula College
Public
42%
n/a
n/a
Moorpark College
Public
32%
n/a
n/a
Moreno Valley College
Public
32%
n/a
n/a
Mount Saint Mary’s University
Non-profit
28%
17%
n/a
Mt San Antonio College
Public
32%
n/a
n/a
MTI College
For-profit
29%
n/a
n/a
Musicians Institute
For-profit
35%
32%
n/a
National Career College
For-profit
36%
n/a
n/a
National Holistic Institute
For-profit
28%
n/a
n/a
National University
Non-profit
32%
n/a
39%
New York Film Academy
For-profit
35%
n/a
n/a
North Adrian’s College of Beauty Inc
For-profit
46%
n/a
n/a
Northcentral University
Non-profit
n/a
n/a
37%
North-West College-Pomona
For-profit
24%
n/a
n/a
North-West College-Van Nuys
For-profit
22%
n/a
n/a
North-West College-West Covina
For-profit
22%
n/a
n/a
Notre Dame de Namur University
Non-profit
26%
32%
47%
NTMA Training Centers of Southern California
Non-profit
27%
n/a
n/a
Occidental College
Non-profit
14%
n/a
n/a
Orange Coast College
Public
29%
n/a
n/a
Otis College of Art and Design
Non-profit
27%
32%
n/a
Pacific College
For-profit
27%
n/a
n/a
Pacific College of Health and Science
For-profit
42%
n/a
47%
Pacific Oaks College
Non-profit
30%
n/a
n/a
Pacific Union College
Non-profit
29%
n/a
n/a
Pacifica Graduate Institute
For-profit
n/a
n/a
47%
Palo Alto University
Non-profit
n/a
n/a
47%
Palomar College
Public
32%
n/a
n/a
Palomar Institute of Cosmetology
For-profit
22%
n/a
n/a
Pasadena City College
Public
37%
n/a
n/a
Paul Mitchell the School-East Bay
For-profit
27%
n/a
n/a
Paul Mitchell the School-Fresno
For-profit
41%
n/a
n/a
Paul Mitchell the School-Modesto
For-profit
32%
n/a
n/a
Paul Mitchell the School-Pasadena
For-profit
32%
n/a
n/a
Paul Mitchell the School-Sacramento
For-profit
37%
n/a
n/a
Paul Mitchell the School-Sherman Oaks
For-profit
27%
n/a
n/a
Paul Mitchell the School-Temecula
For-profit
32%
n/a
n/a
Pepperdine University
Non-profit
20%
22%
39%
Pima Medical Institute-Chula Vista
For-profit
29%
20%
n/a
Pitzer College
Non-profit
17%
n/a
n/a
Platt College-Los Angeles
For-profit
34%
n/a
n/a
Point Loma Nazarene University
Non-profit
19%
27%
n/a
Premiere Career College
For-profit
29%
n/a
n/a
Reedley College
Public
42%
n/a
n/a
Relay Graduate School of Education – California
Non-profit
n/a
n/a
37%
Riverside City College
Public
34%
n/a
n/a
Sacramento City College
Public
42%
n/a
n/a
Saddleback College
Public
30%
n/a
n/a
SAE Expression College
For-profit
42%
n/a
n/a
Saint Mary’s College of California
Non-profit
19%
37%
32%
Salon Success Academy-Corona
For-profit
42%
n/a
n/a
Salon Success Academy-Upland
For-profit
36%
n/a
n/a
Samuel Merritt University
Non-profit
8%
n/a
36%
San Diego Christian College
Non-profit
32%
n/a
n/a
San Diego City College
Public
41%
n/a
n/a
San Diego Mesa College
Public
33%
n/a
n/a
San Diego Miramar College
Public
32%
n/a
n/a
San Diego State University
Public
21%
16%
38%
San Francisco Art Institute
Non-profit
32%
n/a
n/a
San Francisco Institute of Esthetics & Cosmetology Inc
For-profit
31%
n/a
n/a
San Francisco State University
Public
24%
22%
35%
San Joaquin Delta College
Public
46%
n/a
n/a
San Joaquin Valley College-Visalia
For-profit
42%
22%
n/a
San Jose City College
Public
42%
n/a
n/a
San Jose State University
Public
18%
14%
33%
Santa Ana College
Public
32%
n/a
n/a
Santa Barbara Business College-Bakersfield
For-profit
45%
n/a
n/a
Santa Barbara Business College-Santa Maria
For-profit
34%
n/a
n/a
Santa Barbara City College
Public
36%
n/a
n/a
Santa Clara University
Non-profit
9%
27%
n/a
Santa Monica College
Public
33%
n/a
n/a
Santa Rosa Junior College
Public
31%
n/a
n/a
Saybrook University
Non-profit
n/a
n/a
37%
Shasta College
Public
39%
n/a
n/a
Sierra College
Public
40%
n/a
n/a
Simpson University
Non-profit
20%
n/a
n/a
Solano Community College
Public
42%
n/a
n/a
Sonoma State University
Public
21%
14%
37%
South Baylo University
Non-profit
n/a
n/a
n/a
South Coast College
For-profit
42%
n/a
n/a
Southern California Health Institute
For-profit
39%
n/a
n/a
Southern California Institute of Technology
For-profit
23%
n/a
n/a
Southern California University of Health Sciences
Non-profit
n/a
n/a
47%
Southwestern College
Public
32%
n/a
n/a
Southwestern Law School
Non-profit
n/a
n/a
n/a
Spartan College of Aeronautics & Technology
For-profit
31%
n/a
n/a
Stanbridge University
For-profit
20%
n/a
n/a
Stanford University
Non-profit
12%
n/a
17%
SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary
Non-profit
47%
n/a
n/a
Summit College
For-profit
37%
n/a
n/a
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology at Anaheim
Non-profit
32%
n/a
n/a
The Master’s University and Seminary
Non-profit
12%
n/a
n/a
Thomas Jefferson School of Law
Non-profit
n/a
n/a
n/a
Touro University California
Non-profit
n/a
n/a
n/a
Touro University Worldwide
Non-profit
n/a
n/a
32%
Trident University International
For-profit
32%
n/a
33%
Trinity Law School
Non-profit
31%
n/a
38%
UEI College-Fresno
For-profit
50%
37%
n/a
UEI College-Gardena
For-profit
46%
22%
n/a
United Education Institute-Huntington Park Campus
For-profit
45%
37%
n/a
United States University
For-profit
42%
n/a
n/a
Unitek College
For-profit
21%
17%
n/a
Universal Technical Institute of California Inc
For-profit
37%
22%
n/a
Universal Technical Institute of Northern California Inc
For-profit
38%
22%
n/a
University of Antelope Valley
For-profit
31%
n/a
n/a
University of California-Berkeley
Public
13%
14%
30%
University of California-Davis
Public
12%
13%
37%
University of California-Hastings College of Law
Public
n/a
n/a
n/a
University of California-Irvine
Public
15%
14%
37%
University of California-Los Angeles
Public
15%
18%
33%
University of California-Merced
Public
20%
18%
n/a
University of California-Riverside
Public
22%
19%
n/a
University of California-San Diego
Public
13%
12%
31%
University of California-San Francisco
Public
n/a
n/a
32%
University of California-Santa Barbara
Public
16%
19%
28%
University of California-Santa Cruz
Public
20%
18%
32%
University of La Verne
Non-profit
30%
27%
41%
University of Phoenix-California
For-profit
43%
35%
42%
University of Redlands
Non-profit
27%
27%
38%
University of San Diego
Non-profit
16%
24%
n/a
University of San Francisco
Non-profit
19%
22%
41%
University of Southern California
Non-profit
16%
25%
n/a
University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences
For-profit
n/a
n/a
32%
University of the Pacific
Non-profit
19%
22%
n/a
Vanguard University of Southern California
Non-profit
26%
27%
n/a
Ventura College
Public
37%
n/a
n/a
Victor Valley College
Public
46%
n/a
n/a
West Coast Ultrasound Institute
For-profit
32%
n/a
n/a
West Coast University-Los Angeles
For-profit
25%
30%
32%
West Hills College-Coalinga
Public
47%
n/a
n/a
West Hills College-Lemoore
Public
42%
n/a
n/a
West Los Angeles College
Public
32%
n/a
n/a
Western University of Health Sciences
Non-profit
n/a
n/a
n/a
Westmont College
Non-profit
12%
n/a
n/a
Whittier College
Non-profit
29%
32%
n/a
William Jessup University
Non-profit
24%
n/a
n/a
Woodbury University
Non-profit
37%
27%
n/a
Source: College Scorecard
One fix the department has worked on is the loan forgiveness program for borrowers working in public service, which would help educators like Brooks. Prior to the pandemic, even people who were eligible for forgiveness were denied, Kvaal said, which is why fewer than 7,000 people saw forgiveness. Since the Biden Administration announced changes to the program, so far up to 660,000 people have had their loans forgiven through public service.
The Biden administration’s new repayment plan can also significantly cut loan payments or reduce them to $0, Kvaal said, adding that, so far, 4 million people have enrolled in the plan.
Kvaal said the administration is looking at other options.
“The president has asked us to offer loan forgiveness to as many people as possible and as quickly as possible,” Kvaal said. “We’re telling students it’s time for them to repay. At the same time, we’re doing everything we can to reform the student loan program to make sure that students have access to the loan forgiveness that they have earned … and that people are taking advantage of the most affordable payment plan that has ever been created.”
Kvaal said the Education Department is also looking into the amount of debt that comes out of for-profit programs, online graduate programs and the Parent Plus loan program.
Granville, from The Century Foundation, also has national recommendations. For example, Congress should lower the interest rate on student loans. According to The Debt Collective, Congress sets the interest rates for federal student loans. Those rates are tied to the 10-year Treasury note. Because the Federal Reserve has recently been increasing rates, the treasury bond rate has increased and so has the rate for new student loans.
The current fixed rates for new undergraduate loans are at 5.5%, for graduate, 7.05% for professional unsubsidized loans, and 8.05% for Parent Plus and Grad Plus loans.
At the state and local level, Granville said that loan counseling needs to significantly change. Much of the responsibility for understanding student loans is often put on 18- and 19-year-olds, who may be the first in their families to go to college, Granville said.
“The first answer is more grant aid for students so that we can reach a debt-free financing system, not just because it helps students as individuals, but because it helps the state,” he said. “We also haven’t done a great job setting up students for success despite all of their own personal investment in education. We can rectify that situation through more generous repayment plans, but we also need to make sure that we’re giving students high-quality options so they don’t need as much debt in the first place.”
For Brooks, the high school principal with student debt, the ultimate solution is free education.
“If you go to college, you’re stricken with debt,” Brooks said. “If you don’t go to college, then you don’t have a livable wage or enough money to survive. You have to do something.”
And college tuition in California, prior to the mid-1980’s was free, she said.
“I’m of the mindset that education is a public good and it serves everyone to have a highly educated populace,” Brooks said. “It should be free altogether.”
The graduation stage at all California State University (CSU) campuses are vibrant tableaus of dreams achieved. Each cap and gown tell a unique tale of persistence, ambition, and hope. But beneath the prestige and pride lies a sobering reality. For many students, obtaining a diploma also means accumulating debt.
The CSU’s recent decision to increase tuition by 34% over five years, at an annual rate of 6%, might intensify these disparities, potentially impacting the trajectory of many students’ dreams and futures.
While the CSU cites fiscal imperatives for the increase, it’s crucial to consider its effects on students, particularly those from marginalized backgrounds. Higher education, once the beacon of hope and socio-economic mobility, is slowly being priced out of reach for many. Making this path more expensive threatens to sideline those who are meant to benefit from it the most.
The data doesn’t lie, so let’s dive into it. Our recent collaborative report with The Institute for College Access and Success (TICAS) on the CSU system illuminates disturbing trends. While the CSU’s efforts to boost graduation rates are commendable, the cost of these achievements disproportionately impacts students from racially marginalized communities. We found that from the academic year 2021-22 a disconcerting 63% of Black bachelor’s degree recipients are grappling with student debt. In contrast, only about a third of their white and Asian peers face similar financial burdens. Moreover, only 48% of Black students secure their degree within six years. As these stats indicate, the increase in tuition could threaten the very essence of CSU, known for its diversity and inclusivity.
The data tells a story that reaches far beyond mere statistics. Picture the path of a first-generation college student from a marginalized background. They step onto campus, buoyed by dreams and shouldering the weight of their family’s expectations. As they navigate the academic world, they confront both systemic obstacles and personal challenges.
Yet, as graduation draws near, a looming debt casts a shadow over their achievements. Each loan statement they receive isn’t merely an invoice; it’s a stark reminder of the price of ambition, of wanting to change your life for the better. These are dreams recalibrated or paused, not because of a lack of drive, capability, passion, or talent but for the sake of survival. Thus, the narrative shifts from higher education being a bridge to dreams to a poignant query: Is the investment truly worth its promise?
Add to this the ramifications of the CSU’s recent decision. Annual tuition increases totaling 34% can lead to longer work hours, fewer academic credits, or even postponed semesters. Each subsequent loan statement, irrespective of graduation status, serves as a somber reminder of the tangible costs of dreams and the yearning for a brighter future. Such decisions don’t just delay dreams; they risk derailing them.
At this defining moment, the CSU must introspectively reassess its foundational principles. The recent tuition hike decision has resonated like an unsettling alarm throughout the CSU community. While certain factions might view this as a necessary step to counteract fiscal deficits, for many students, it’s an added layer to an already challenging academic climb. To paint a clearer picture, on most campuses, our most economically disadvantaged students would need to clock in twenty or even upwards of thirty hours of paid work a week, in certain regions, just to afford the cost of attendance.
Beyond individual concerns, society must recognize wider ramifications. Those students we’re most committed to elevating may increasingly feel academia’s gates slowly creaking shut. If financial burdens eclipse the dream of higher education, the entire society loses out. We risk sidelining tomorrow’s innovators, thinkers, leaders, and agents of societal change. The budding poet, poised to inspire an era, might remain silent; the aspiring scientist, on the brink of groundbreaking discoveries might opt for more immediate financial gains by taking a job instead. The community advocates, starting their journey in student leadership and deeply attuned to their community’s historical narratives, might never fully realize their potential to uplift and lead.
This is a rallying cry for unity. As the CSU system charts its course, it is vital that policymakers, educators, students, and the wider community actively participate in this critical dialogue. We must also confront the sobering truth that members of our community will disproportionately bear the inequitable burden of a college degree. It’s crucial that we safeguard against making the pursuit of dreams financially untenable. After all, dreams cultivated within the halls of academia should ignite, illuminate, and elevate – not ensnare.
•••
Dominic Quan Treseler is president of the Cal State Student Association and a political science major at San Jose State University.
The opinions expressed in this commentary represent those of the author. EdSource welcomes commentaries representing diverse points of view. If you would like to submit a commentary, please review our guidelines and contact us.
“I was considering a master’s program through Cal Poly,” Monreal said. “But with the tuition increase, I might just consider getting a master’s degree anywhere else.”
For students like Monreal, who already manage student loans to take on college tuition costs, the 6% yearly tuition increases will have a profound impact on their education choices.
As an older sister to several high school-age siblings, Monreal said that she would encourage them to take into consideration these tuition increases when applying to colleges.
“I have younger siblings, and I think I would encourage them not to go to four-year college,” she said. “As a first-year, I would recommend any junior college so they can get some units under their belt at first, if the cost is increasing so much.”
Gabriela’s story gathered by California Student Journalism Corps member Arabel Meyer
Your child knows English grammar rules but still hesitates to speak up in class. They understand vocabulary but struggle to frame answers confidently in exams. Their teacher says, “They know the answers but don’t express them clearly.”This is a common problem for many students in Lucknow today. And it often leads to low marks, hesitation in school discussions, and lack of confidence in daily life.
That’s why searching for “English tuition near me in Lucknow” is more than just typing keywords into Google. It’s about finding a tutor who understands your child’s learning needs, adapts their teaching style, and builds confidence along with knowledge.
Why English Tuition is Important Today
English isn’t just a school subject anymore. It’s the language of:
✔️ College interviews and competitive exams ✔️ Job placements and professional communication ✔️ Daily interactions in an English-speaking environment
Strong English skills build:
✅ Confidence to speak fluently and clearly ✅ Ability to frame answers effectively in exams ✅ Better understanding of all subjects taught in English medium schools
When students struggle with English, it affects their performance across all subjects, and more importantly, their confidence in expressing themselves.
What Makes a Good English Tutor?
While searching for English tuition near you in Lucknow, here’s what to look for:
✅ Good communication skills. A tutor who speaks clearly will teach your child to speak clearly. ✅ Patience and empathy. Every child learns at their own pace and feels nervous while speaking in English. ✅ Focus on spoken and written English. Both are equally important for academics and future goals. ✅ Interactive teaching methods. Engaging sessions keep children interested in learning. ✅ Personalised attention. A tutor who understands your child’s weaknesses and builds on their strengths.
🏠 Comfort of learning at home. Children learn better in a familiar environment where they can ask questions freely without feeling embarrassed. 🗣️ One-to-one attention. The tutor focuses only on your child, correcting mistakes instantly and encouraging them to speak confidently. 📚 Flexible timings. Tuition sessions can be scheduled according to your child’s best learning hours, ensuring better focus. 🌱 Holistic growth. Good English tuition improves vocabulary, grammar, writing skills, spoken fluency, and overall confidence in communication.
How TheTuitionTeacher Helps
At TheTuitionTeacher, we understand that each child is unique. Their learning styles, pace, and challenges are different. That’s why we:
✔️ Have qualified and experienced English tutors available in every area of Lucknow, including Hazratganj, Gomti Nagar, Indira Nagar, Aliganj, and more. ✔️ Provide one-to-one demo sessions so parents can choose the tutor who best fits their child’s learning needs. ✔️ Match your child with tutors who are experts in school curriculum, grammar, spoken English, and exam preparation. ✔️ Offer continuous progress tracking so parents stay updated on their child’s improvement.
Whether your child is in CBSE, ICSE, UP Board, or any other state board, our English tutors make learning simple, practical, and enjoyable. They focus not just on academic excellence but also on building communication confidence that will help your child in future interviews and social interactions.
Real Student Stories
One of our students, Riya from Aliganj, used to hesitate to speak even simple sentences in English. Within 3 months of personalised English tuition, she started framing her own answers confidently and even gave her school morning assembly speech in English. Her mother shared, “I never thought she would speak like this so soon. Her tutor made learning so easy and fun.”
These stories remind us that English tuition is not just about marks – it’s about giving children the voice they deserve.
Final Thoughts
If you’re searching for “English tuition near me in Lucknow,” don’t just look for someone to teach from the textbook. Choose a tutor who helps your child speak confidently, write clearly, and understand English deeply.
Because in the end, English is not just a subject. It’s a life skill your child will use every single day – to express thoughts, build a career, and connect with the world confidently.
Looking for the best English tutor near you in Lucknow? Post your home tuition requirement today and get a free demo class with qualified English tutors at your doorstep.
Briana Munoz felt forced to take seven courses last semester to graduate on time and protect her financial aid status.
Courtesy, Briana Munoz
California State University trustees voted Wednesday to expand grants to fund the full cost of tuition and living expenses for students who show they need it to attend college.
The decision is the first step in a commitment the trustees made to students last fall that at least a third of revenue from a 6% annual tuition hike would go to financial aid.A more detailed plan will be presented to the board in May.
Over the five-year period of the tuition increase, more than $280 million will go toward financial aid, increasing total funding to the State University Grant to $981 million by the 2028-29 school year.
About 87% of Cal State students have their tuition fully or partially covered by grants and aid. Yet, some students still struggle with the cost of attending college due to living expenses such as food, housing and transportation.
Although there is regional variation of housing and food costs, total attendance costs statewide range from $22,000 to $32,000 annually. Nearly 40% of CSU students rely on loans to make up the difference between financial aid and actual costs.
“The fact is tuition as the price of admission is not what keeps students away from CSU,” trustee Julia Lopez said. “Almost nine out of 10 students get some sort of tuition grant, but it’s other costs.”
The trustees favored giving students stipends, once their tuition costs are met, to cover their expenses, with the expectation that students would work less and graduate sooner. The State University Grant has traditionally been used to cover tuition. The stipends would be up to $5,000 and prioritize students with the greatest needs.
The trustees also voted to create consistent financial aid measurements and communications for students and their families after learning of significant differences across the 23 campuses, making it difficult for families to compare financial aid offers.
But there is one immediate challenge CSU is facing in its financial aid improvement goals – the current national rollout of FAFSA simplification. The new, simplified Free Application for Federal Student Aid application was delayed from Oct.1 to Dec. 31. Colleges and universities received notification on Tuesday that they wouldn’t receive students’ financial aid information until March, squeezing students who generally have until May 1 to select a college.
Nathan Evans, CSU’s vice chancellor for academic and student affairs, said the problems with the new FAFSA may be even worse for California.
Students who are permanent residents or U.S. citizens, but who have an undocumented parent, are unable to complete the new application because the system requires a Social Security number for each parent or guardian. Parents without Social Security numbers are also locked out of contributing to existing FAFSA forms.
Evans said leaders from CSU, the University of California, the community colleges, and the state’s independent colleges met earlier this week with the California Student Aid Commission to plan potential workarounds.
Another complication for CSU’s financial aid plans – the scheduled expansion of the Cal Grant, which aids the state’s low-income students – was expected to also begin in 2024-25. But the Legislature must first approve funding. CSU’s institutional aid numbers to students would depend on the amounts students receive in other federal and state aid.
“This is a year like none other,” Evans said. “There are some additional complexities this year, given that not only has the application been revamped, but calculations are changing … so there is a lot of unpredictability in the process.”
More than 20 years ago, California passed a law allowing some undocumented immigrant students to attend college with in-state tuition, if they meet certain requirements.
But immigrant rights advocates say many students who should have been eligible have been wrongfully denied in-state tuition because of confusion over requirements, misinformation and different interpretations of the law at different college campuses.
“We lose that incredible brain power and colleges are losing enrollment,” said Nancy Jodaitis, director of higher education for Immigrants Rising, a nonprofit organization that advocates for undocumented people to achieve educational and career goals.
Immigrants Rising brought together officials from all three public college systems — California Community Colleges, California State University and University of California — to discuss and agree on answers to frequently-asked questions about the law.
The result is a document called the Systemwide AB 540 FAQ, which all three systems have now signed. The document includes answers to 59 questions, such as:
What if a student graduated from a California high school (completing three years’ worth of high school credits), but did not attend three years at a California high school?
Does a student have to take classes full time for their attendance to count?
Does all their coursework have to be taken at the same school?
Spokespeople from UC, CSU and California Community Colleges all celebrated the document.
Paul Feist, vice chancellor of communications and marketing for the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office, said the document is particularly important because there are several different laws regarding the nonresident tuition exemption.
The first bill exempting some undocumented immigrants from out-of-state tuition, Assembly Bill 540, was signed into law in 2001. Since then, three other bills have been passed to expand the law, in 2014, 2017 and 2022.
“While the intent was to expand access to AB 540 financial assistance, they had the unintended effect of making it more difficult to navigate,” Feist said. “This FAQ is designed to provide clearer explanations and provide additional resources in advising students.”
Under current California law, students who are undocumented or have temporary protection from deportation such as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), or who are U.S. citizens or permanent residents, are eligible for in-state tuition and state financial aid, if they attended at least three years of high school, adult school or community college in California and obtained a high school diploma or equivalent, an associate degree or fulfilled the minimum requirements to transfer to a UC or CSU.
Access to state financial aid and in-state tuition can be a critical factor for undocumented students, who are barred from receiving federal financial aid. Without the law in place, some of them would be charged tuition rates for international students, often much higher than in-state tuition.
“This is huge,” said Maria Gutierrez, a college counselor at Chabot College in Hayward and a doctoral student at San Francisco State University. “It helps us be aligned and have something in writing.” Before the FAQ document, Gutierrez says college staff in charge of approving exemptions from out-of-state tuition were sometimes afraid to make decisions without written proof of how to interpret the law.
Gutierrez herself has benefited from AB 540. She came to the U.S. when she was 5 years old on a visa, which later expired. She attended elementary, middle and most of high school in California. She also graduated from high school in California. But when she applied to attend community college in California, different campuses disagreed on whether she was eligible for in-state tuition because she had spent two years of high school in Utah. At the time, a second law had recently been passed to allow colleges to consider years of attendance in elementary and middle school for AB 540 eligibility.
“One college that I went to in So Cal, I was approved for AB 540. When I had to go back to the Bay Area, I was not approved for AB 540. So then I was confused that there was this inconsistency,” Gutierrez said.
A few years later, when she applied to transfer to a four-year college, both UC and CSU campuses told her she was not eligible for in-state tuition, even though by then, a law had passed that clarified that attendance at community college could be counted toward the requirements. She spent a semester paying out-of-state tuition at San Jose State University, before the university finally acknowledged she was legally eligible for in-state tuition.
As a college counselor, Gutierrez continues to meet students who have been incorrectly told they are not eligible for in-state tuition.
“It’s crazy because in reality it hasn’t changed much,” she said. However, she said, the financial burden is harder now, because most students graduating from high school cannot apply for work permits under DACA, because the government has not accepted new applications since 2017.
“I see my students now and I see the struggles they’re going through. If I didn’t have DACA, I honestly don’t think I would be where I am now,” Gutierrez said. “There’s no way that I would’ve been able to pay nonresident fees or wait for whoever it is that is determining that to learn what they need to do for me to be able to go to college.”
Advocates say they hope the document will help colleges give correct information and avoid students having to research on their own for information.
California also recently streamlined the process for undocumented students to apply for financial aid and exemption from in-state tuition on the same application when they fill out the California Dream Act application. In the past, students had to both fill out a California Dream Act application and an AB 540 affidavit form for each college. Now, the AB 540 form will be part of the same application.
Diana Aguilar-Cruz said that change is significant. Aguilar-Cruz is currently pursuing a master’s degree in public health at Cal State Fullerton. When she first began her undergraduate education at Cal Poly Pomona, she was charged nonresident tuition, which was almost double the in-state tuition. She had immigrated to the U.S. from Mexico City in 2015, when she was 14 years old, and lived with her grandmother in Baldwin Park while attending high school.
She had completed a California Dream Act application, but no one told her she also had to complete a separate form. After researching it herself online, she found the form and completed it, at which point the university finally changed her tuition to in-state.
“If I didn’t find it in my Google search, would I be paying in-state tuition for my four years of college?” Aguilar-Cruz said. “I always think to myself, what would have happened if I was a more fearful student or a student who did not have a strong support system at home?”
This article was corrected to clarify how Maria Gutierrez immigrated to the U.S. and that Chabot College is in Hayward.
Imagine this: you’re great at teaching. You’ve helped students score better, understand faster, and even love subjects they once feared. But despite your talent, your phone isn’t buzzing with inquiries. No new tuitions. No leads. Just waiting.
Sounds familiar?
If you’re a home tutor or running your own tuition classes, you already know — being good at teaching is not enough. You have to be found. You have to stand out. You have to connect with the right parents and students who need you right now.
So, let’s break down some real, tried-and-tested strategies to help you get more tuition leads in your area.
1. Start Where You Are: Local Visibility is Everything
Before trying to dominate the internet, dominate your neighborhood.
Print Flyers: Yes, old school works. Design a simple, clean flyer and distribute it near schools, local grocery stores, stationery shops, apartment notice boards, and coaching centers.
Word of Mouth: Tell your friends, family, neighbors, and current students’ parents to recommend you. Sometimes, the best leads are one phone call away — you just need to ask.
Pro Tip: Offer a small discount for the first month to anyone who comes via a referral. This motivates people to talk about your classes.
2. List Yourself on Local Tuition Platforms
If your name isn’t searchable, you don’t exist. Simple.
Get listed on platforms like TheTuitionTeacher.com, UrbanPro, or other local tutor directories.
Make sure your profile has:
A clear photograph
A short, genuine introduction
Subjects and classes you teach
Your location, timings, and contact details
Most parents these days begin their search for a tutor online — don’t miss the boat.
3. Show, Don’t Just Tell: Build Social Proof
You don’t need a fancy website. Just simple proof that you can teach and you get results.
Ask current or past students/parents for short testimonials.
Create a free Instagram or Facebook page for your tutoring. Post:
Quick tips or fun facts related to your subject
Student success stories
Study hacks
Photos of handwritten notes or solved doubt
Even posting once a week builds trust. It shows you’re active, approachable, and professional.
4. Get Smart with WhatsApp & SMS
Don’t underestimate the power of a small, polite WhatsApp message.
Collect phone numbers from local WhatsApp groups (school groups, parent groups, locality groups).
Send a message like: “Hi! I’m a tutor based in [Your Area], currently teaching Class 9 & 10 Science. I have a few slots open this month. If you or someone you know is looking for help in studies, feel free to reach out. Happy to help!”
Keep it short. Don’t spam. Send in gaps. And always offer value, not just a sales pitch.
5. Partner with Schools, Bookshops & Stationery Stores
Form meaningful offline partnerships.
Talk to local school teachers or principals (especially in private schools) and ask if they can refer students who need extra help.
Ask stationery shop owners if you can leave a stack of flyers or a small poster at their counter. In return, offer to promote their store to your students.
This creates a win-win, and trust me, people remember those who support them locally.
6. Offer a Free Demo Class — But Make It Memorable
Don’t just give a free class. Give them a glimpse into your teaching magic.
Prepare a short, high-impact lesson.
Use visuals, ask engaging questions, and show how you simplify difficult concepts.
End with a clear takeaway: “In my classes, we don’t just study — we understand.”
A great demo class is your strongest pitch.
7. Follow Up Like a Professional
Sometimes, a parent might say “We’ll think about it.”
Follow up in 3 days.
Don’t wait endlessly. Send a message like
Persistence (without being pushy) shows commitment.
“Hi [Parent’s Name], just checking in to see if you had any more questions about my classes. I’ve got 2 slots open and would love to help your child. Let me know!”
8. Stay Patient, Stay Consistent
Lastly — remember, lead generation is not luck. It’s momentum.
Every flyer, every message, every call adds up. Maybe not today. But over time, you’ll become the go-to tutor in your area.
“Success in tuition is not just about knowledge — it’s about visibility, trust, and consistency.“
Final Thoughts
Whether you’re teaching from your living room or running full-fledged batches, the tuition business is all about one thing: impact.
And the more people you reach, the more students you can help.
So start small, but start today.
Want to reach more students faster? Get listed on TheTuitionTeacher.com — and let parents in your area discover your expertise in minutes.
👉 If you’re a tutor based in Lucknow and looking to get more home tuition leads, TheTuitionTeacher can help you connect with the right students. Whether you’re just starting or trying to grow your tutoring business — this is the platform where your journey begins.