برچسب: Learned

  • What I learned from ChatGPT’s math mistakes

    What I learned from ChatGPT’s math mistakes


    Credit: Matheus Bertelli / Pexels

    I was traveling recently when my daughter called for help with her algebra homework. Faced with a challenging problem, I wanted to confirm my understanding before guiding hers. As someone studying artificial intelligence in education, I was curious: Could ChatGPT help?

    I typed in the problem: “Given the equation y=abx, if b is less than one, what happens to the graph as x gets larger?”

    ChatGPT shot back an answer” — “As x increases, the graph tends to approach 0” — though no explanation was included. (I realized I should have asked for one in my initial prompt). The AI’s use of the word “tends” left me feeling unsure of my own comprehension, and I like to deeply understand a math concept before explaining it to another person (in this case, my own kid). So I asked ChatGPT: Why?

    The AI spat out an explanation for its solution, but confused and dissatisfied with its answer, I continued to probe. “But … why … I don’t understand … why?” After a few more exchanges, my decision to keep pushing for clarification was justified when, to my surprise and satisfaction, ChatGPT stated: “I appreciate your patience. I misspoke again. I apologize for any confusion. I made an error in my previous message.”

    Though I was able to effectively conclude my cross-country tutoring session, my concerns lingered. What if I’d accepted the original answer as truth? What if I hadn’t pushed several times for the AI to justify its response? And what if I’d been … an eighth grader trying to use ChatGPT to help me complete my algebra homework?

    Artificial Intelligence has become an integral part of our lives, and its presence in classrooms and schools is becoming ubiquitous. While AI has the potential to greatly assist students and educators, now, perhaps more than ever, we need to strengthen our uniquely human critical-thinking skills. My experience using ChatGPT sheds light on the importance of approaching AI tools with a discerning mindset and offers the following lessons:

    Challenging AI is a vital 21st century skill.

    My interaction with ChatGPT underscores the necessity for students to be equipped with the ability to challenge and question the information provided by AI. While these tools are powerful, they are not infallible. Students must be equipped with the ability to use these tools and, more importantly, with the skills to challenge and question the information they receive.

    Students need the confidence to ask probing questions.

    Persistence played a key role in my ability to uncover inaccuracies in the AI-generated information. Students need the confidence to ask probing questions and challenge AI responses to avoid accepting misleading conclusions. Educators should emphasize the importance of persistence when engaging with AI tools, encouraging students to pursue both accuracy and conceptual understanding.

    Beyond correct answers, embrace the learning process.

    While AI can provide correct answers, its limitations become apparent when delving into the intricacies of the learning process. The purpose of education isn’t only about obtaining correct solutions; it is about understanding the underlying concepts, asking meaningful questions and engaging in a dynamic dialogue with the material. AI tools should enhance this process, not overshadow it.

    Cultivating a mindset of curiosity and skepticism

    As we integrate AI into educational settings, educators must cultivate in their students a mindset of curiosity and healthy skepticism. Students should be encouraged to view AI as a resource but not an infallible authority, and they should learn to ask follow-up questions to reach their own conclusions. We should all embrace the 2-year-old inside of us and constantly ask: Why? Why is that? And why is that?

    Teach the tool, not just the subject

    The incorporation of AI into educational practices necessitates a shift in our pedagogical approaches. This involves imparting not just technical skills but also fostering a critical understanding of the tools students interact with. Educators should integrate lessons on effectively using and questioning AI into their curriculum. This will ensure students grasp the subject while developing a critical understanding of their learning tools.

    Conclusion

    My exploration of the exponential decay equation with ChatGPT symbolizes the broader challenges and opportunities presented by AI in education. While AI offers incredible potential, it demands a massive recalibration of our educational approaches. Let us embrace the responsibility to guide students in navigating this landscape with discernment, curiosity and the confidence to question. In doing so, we can equip them not just with correct answers but with the skills to navigate the dynamic intersections of technology and learning in the years to come.

    I ran this essay through ChatGPT and asked it to suggest a good call to action for my conclusion, and will let the AI have the last word:

    In the ever-evolving classroom of the future, the most powerful tool may not be the one with the most answers but the one that empowers us to ask the right questions.

    (Follow the entire interaction with ChatGPT in the screenshots below.)

    •••

    Jonathan Osler is a nonprofit consultant and was formerly a high school teacher, principal, and CalTeach faculty member.

    The opinions in this commentary are those of the author. If you would like to submit a commentary, please review our guidelines and contact us.





    Source link

  • I graduated in three years: Here’s what I learned

    I graduated in three years: Here’s what I learned


    Ashley Bolter at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo graduation in June 2024.

    Credit: Courtesy of Ashley Bolter

    When I first arrived at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, I thought I would be there for four years and that I would graduate with the friends I made in my first weeks of school.

    But sitting in my freshman dorm room, roughly planning out the classes I would take each quarter to finish my degree, I was surprised to find out that I would graduate early if I stayed on the track I was on. 

    I have always loved school and wanted to learn as much as I possibly could. When I was younger, I even imagined myself getting a doctorate just so I could stay in school longer. Ironically, it was this love of school that shortened my time in college.

    Because I wanted to take as many classes as I could in high school, I jumped on the opportunity to take Advanced Placement and dual enrollment classes at the local colleges. These classes allowed me to enter college with extra units, meaning I would only need to take one class during my fourth year. 

    But being a first-generation college student relying on financial aid and scholarships to get through school meant I couldn’t afford to be a part-time student. While I could have filled my schedule with unnecessary classes or picked up a third minor, graduating early was the best decision for me. 

    Many people say to make the most of college because it goes by really fast; I found that to be true. Yet knowing that I was on track to finish a year ahead of schedule, I planned for that shorter timetable. I was still able to get everything out of my college experience that I wanted, while improving my time management skills and saving a bit of money. 

    On top of taking an average of 20 units every quarter, I was able to participate in the extracurriculars I wanted, such as marching band, writing for the school newspaper, working a part-time job, interning in the field I wanted to work in and spending time with friends. 

    A lot of this was the result of carefully planning my schedule each quarter and thinking of backups in case I couldn’t get into the classes I needed. I also had to be really organized to stay on top of assignments and activities. Keeping a detailed planner and physically checking off requirements when they were completed really helped me with this.

    Although the busy schedule added more stress in the moment, and I was sad to leave my friends behind, I’m happy I was able to complete my degree in the amount of time that made sense for me. And equally important, I feel ready to enter my career. 

    Taking four years to complete my degree isn’t what worked for me; and four years is increasingly not working for college students across the country, as well. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, only 49% of undergraduate students who started college in 2016 graduated within four years, and completion of a bachelor’s program is now defined as graduating within six years.

    Students shouldn’t feel forced into following the rigid four-year timeline of completion that universities often put out. Students should take however long makes sense and is manageable for them. For me, that was three years. For some it might be the traditional four years and for others it might be six to seven years.

    However long it takes them, students should be able to look back on their college years feeling satisfied and prepared for their next step in life.

    •••

    Ashley Bolter, a recent graduate of Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, is a member of EdSource’s California Student Journalism Corps.

    The opinions in this commentary are those of the authors. If you would like to submit a commentary, please review our guidelines and contact us.





    Source link

  • Denis Smith: What I Learned at the NPE Conference in Ohio

    Denis Smith: What I Learned at the NPE Conference in Ohio


    Denis Smith retired from his position at the Ohio Department of Education, where he oversaw charter schools (which are called “community schools” in Ohio). In this post, he describes what he saw at the Network for Public Education Conference in Columbus, Ohio, in early April.

    He wrote:

    When It’s About Hands Off! That Also Applies to Public Schools

    The Hands Off! demonstrations at the Ohio Statehouse that drew thousands of protestors wasn’t the only gathering of activists last weekend in downtown Columbus. Just a short distance away at the Hyatt Regency Hotel, a smaller but equally passionate gathering of concerned citizens from across the nation came to Ohio’s capital city to attend the Network for Public Education’s National Conference and affirm their support for the common school, the very symbol of democracy in this increasingly divided nation.

    That disunion is driven in part by the rapid growth of universal educational vouchers and charter schools, where public funds flow to private and religious schools as well as privately operated charter schools and where public accountability and oversight of taxpayer funds is limited or even absent. In many states, including Ohio, those public funds in the form of vouchers are drawn from the very state budget line item that is earmarked for public schools.

    Of particular concern to the conference attendees is the division in communities fueled by vouchers, which have been shown in some states to subsidize private and religious school tuition exceeding 80% of those enrolled. In Ohio, according to research conducted by former Ohio legislator Stephen Dyer, the figure is 91%.Several speakers referred to this situation as “welfare for the rich” and “an entitlement for the wealthy.” 

    The research shared at the conference also confirmed the findings of the National Coalition for Public Education that “most recipients of private school vouchers in universal programs are wealthy families whose children never attended public schools in the first place.” So much for the tired Republican rhetoric of vouchers being a lifeline of escape from “failing schools” for poor inner-city children.

    Another strong area of concern shared at the NPE event was the growing intrusion of religious organizations like Life Wise Academy which recruit students for release time Bible study during the school day. While attendees were told that school guidelines direct that such activities are to be scheduled during electives and lunch, the programs still conflict with the normal school routine and put a burden on school resources, where time is needed for separating release time students and adjusting the instructional routine because of the arrival and departure of a group within the classroom.

    One presenter, concerned about students receiving conflicting information, said that his experience as a science teacher found situations where there was a disconnect between what he termed “Biblical stories and objective facts.” In addition, he shared that a group of LifeWise students missed a solar eclipse because of their time in religious instruction.  

    Some Ohio school districts, including Westerville and Worthington in Franklin County, had to amend their policies in the wake of HB 8, which mandated that districts have religious instruction release time policies in place. The district policies had been written as an attempt to lessen the possibility of other religious programs wanting access to students and the further disruption that would cause to the school routine. 

    The recent legislative activity about accommodating religious groups like Life Wise is at variance with history, as conference chair and Network for Public Education founder Dr. Diane Ravitch pointed out in her remarks about the founding of Ohio. As part of the Northwest Territory, she noted that Ohio was originally divided into 32 plots, with plot 16, being reserved for a public school. No plot was set aside for a religious school.

    Ohio became the first state to be formed from the Northwest Territory, and its provision for public education would become a prototype for the young republic. The common school, an idea central to the founders of the state, would be located such “that local schools would have an income and that the community schoolhouses would be centrally located for all children.”

    Unfortunately, the idea of the common school being centrally located in every community is an idea not centrally located within the minds of right-wing Republican legislators. From the information exchanged at the conference, that is the case in the great majority of statehouses, and a matter of great concern for continuing national cohesiveness.

    The theme of the NPE National Conference, Public Schools – Where All Students Are Welcome, stands in marked contrast with the exclusionary practices of private and religious schools where, unlike public schools, there are no requirements to accept and enroll every student interested in attending. While these schools are reluctant to accept students who may need additional instructional support, they show no reluctance in accepting state voucher payments.

    Texas Rep. Gina Hinojosa. Photo: Texas House of Representatives

    Texas State Representative Gina Hinojosa, one of the keynote speakers, told the audience about her experience in fighting Gov. Greg Abbott’s voucher scheme and the double meaning of the term school choice. “School choice is also the school’s choice,” she told the audience, as she estimated that 80% or more of state funds will go to kids who are already enrolled in private and religious schools.

    Her battle with the Texas governor, who has defined the passage of voucher legislation in the Lone Star State as his “urgent priority,” is a tale of his alliance with Jeff Yass, a pro-voucher Pennsylvania billionaire who has donated $12 million so far to Abbott’s voucher crusade. 

    Hinojosa was scathing in her criticism of Abbott and his fellow Republicans and of a party that once “worshipped at the altar of accountability.” Now, she told the attendees, “they want free cash money, with no strings attached.” 

    “Grift, graft, and greed” is the narrative of appropriating public funds for private purposes, Hinojosa believes, a tale of supporting “free taxpayer money with no accountability.”

    Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz. Photo: Denis Smith

    The NPE conference ended with an address by Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, the 2024 Democratic Vice-Presidential nominee. With his background as a former teacher and coach, Walz had a strong connect with an audience comprised mostly of educators and public school advocates. His folksy language and sense of humor further endeared him to the conference attendees.

    Based on the continuing bad behavior of Jeff Yass and other affluent actors in the voucher and charter wars, greedy bastards is a better descriptor than oligarchs, he observed. From the reaction of the audience and what they heard previously from Gina Hinojosa and other presenters, the language offered by Walz was a more accurate definition of welfare for the wealthy. 

    At the end of his remarks, Walz encouraged educators not to despair but to accept their key place in society. “There is a sense that servant leadership comes out of serving in public education.”

    Attendees at the NPE conference included educators, school board members, attorneys, legislators, clergy, and policy makers – a cross-section of America. Their presence affirmed a core belief that the public school, open to all, represents the very essence of a democratic society. And there is no debate about whether or notthose schools are under attack by right-wing legislatures intent on rewarding higher-income constituents with tuition support to schools that choose their students as they exercise the “school’s choice.”(As a devotee of the Apostrophe Protection Society, I applaud this distinction.)

    So what are we going to do about this? Attendees left the conference with some strong themes.

    The choir needs to sing louder.

    Hope over fear. Aspiration over despair.

    The road to totalitarianism is littered with people who say you’re overreacting.

    Who are the leaders of the Democratic Party? They’re out there. On the streets.

    It’s not just don’t give up. Be an activist.

    As the loudness about the subject of what is more aptly described as “the school’s choice” gets louder,” you can bet that servant leaders like Diane Ravitch, Gina Hinojosa, Tim Walz and others are making a difference in responding to the challenge of servant leadership to ensure that the common school, so central to 19th century communities in the Northwest Territory and beyond, continues to be the choice of every community for defining America and the democracy it represents.

                                                                       



    Source link