Kamala Harris introduces Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as running mate in Philadelphia on Aug. 6, 2024. Credit: Phil McAuliffe/Polaris
Rarely if ever have visions of education offered by the two major party tickets in a presidential campaign been so radically different.
Vice President Kamala Harris’ selection of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate this week affirmed her total support of public education — along with her acknowledgment of the crucial contributions of teachers, not only to her personal success but to the well-being of the nation as a whole. In his first appearance with Harris in Philadelphia on Tuesday, Walz spoke favorably of her view of education as a “ticket to the middle class.”
By contrast, Trump and Vance take a conspiratorial view of education in which public schools are viewed as vehicles to indoctrinate children into left-wing ideologies. Rather than strengthening public education, a major goal of the Trump campaign, as in his previous ones, would be to provide parents with alternatives to what he, and many others on the right, disparagingly refer to as “government schools.”
“Our public schools have been taken over by the radical left maniacs,” Trump declared in a video outlining his position earlier this year. To undercut the far-left influence he is alleging, he is promising to “cut funding for any school program that promotes critical race theory, gender ideologies, or any other racial, sexual or political content.”
Harris has yet to issue a campaign platform on education (or any other issue for that matter). But when she ran for president in 2019, support for public education was a key element, including backing universal preschool and debt-free college. Not surprisingly, the American Federation of Teachers was the first major union to endorse her presidential bid this year, soon followed by the National Education Association. And as vice president, she has been a prominent advocate on behalf of President Joe Biden’s many education initiatives, including his big push to provide student loan relief.
In Philadelphia, Walz acknowledged he is almost certainly the first vice presidential nominee whose principal occupation before entering politics was as a public school teacher.
For a decade, Walz taught social studies and coached football at Mankato West High School in a politically mixed community 80 miles from Minneapolis. Before moving to there, he and wife Gwen were teachers in Nebraska for nearly 10 years.
As governor, one of his catchphrases has been to “fully fund” public schools. To that end, last year, he pushed for a $7 billion increase in school funding — and was eventually able to convince the Legislature, in the face of Republican opposition, to approve a $2.2 billion increase, still a significant amount in his state. He also signed a bill allowing schools to offer free meals for all students regardless of income.
Vance, by contrast, has echoed much of Trump’s rhetoric on education. On the website for his 2022 U.S. Senate campaign, for example, he lashed out at “the continued CRT indoctrination in our kids’ schools.” He also took aim at what he called the “radical left’s culture war waged during Covid-19” in closing public schools during the pandemic.
In Congress, Vance has focused most of his attention on higher education, and what he has called “left-wing domination” of colleges and universities. In the Senate, for example, he has sponsored legislation making it more difficult for colleges to accept donations from “foreign entities” – which he said would prevent the Chinese Communist Party from “exerting influence over American educational institutions.”
By contrast, Walz, as governor, has made greater access to public universities in his state a major priority. That includes backing the North Star Scholarship Program which underwrites tuition to any public college in Minnesota, along with big increases in funding to higher education in general.
Nowhere are the differences between the two tickets in their visions for education starker than in their views on teachers.
Harris has repeatedly paid tribute to Frances Wilson, her first-grade teacher at Thousand Oaks Elementary School in Berkeley. In recognition of the challenges teachers face, a major pledge in her 2019 campaign for president was a hugely ambitious initiative to raise the average salaries of teachers by $13,500 through a massive 10-year, $315 billion federal program.
In Philadelphia, Walz shared that not only was his father a teacher, but that he and his three siblings “followed in his footsteps.” He, like two of his three siblings, married a teacher. His wife, Gwen, has been a “public educator” for 29 years. “Don’t ever underestimate teachers,” Walz told the crowd amid cheers.
Trump, by contrast, continues to berate teachers for supposedly indoctrinating children with anti-American ideologies. In his campaign video, he railed against “Marxism being taught in schools” that “is aggressively hostile to Judeo-Christian teaching.”
“As the saying goes, personnel is policy, and at the end of the day, if we have pink-haired communists teaching our kids, we have a major problem,” Trump said.
He is also promising to create a “new credentialing body” to certify teachers “who embrace patriotic values and understand that their job is not to indoctrinate children, but to educate them.” He also wants to abolish teacher tenure, and to give preference in federal funding to states and school districts that support his efforts to do so.
Walz has been unafraid to take on some of the more difficult issues around gender identity in schools. While at Mankato West High, he agreed to be the first faculty sponsor of the gay-straight alliance on the campus. “It really needed to be the football coach, who was the soldier and was straight and was married” in the position, he explained.
Within minutes of Harris announcing her vice presidential pick, commentators on Fox News were going after Walz for supporting legislation requiring tampons in boys’ bathrooms (actually all bathrooms), along with the more customary GOP critique that both of them will be controlled by teachers’ unions.
It is impossible to predict just how large a role issues like these will play in the remaining 90 days of this accelerated campaign. But what is clear is that any battles around education will be waged on ideological grounds, rather than on the best policies to improve public education, and, most importantly, what is needed to ensure that all students succeed.
